|
|
Lake Fly Fishing Equipment Essentials Copyright © 2010 Michael Gorman Reproduction of the text or photos are allowed only by the expressed permission of the author. I remember clipping a thought-provoking photo from the sports section of my local newspaper some years ago. At the finish line of a major horse race were two horses with the nose of the winner merely a couple of inches ahead of the beaten horse. Literally, a photo finish. The winner --- the one who got all the horse racing glory, and most of the money, that day --- had a slight edge, all that was needed to win. The story in this photograph has many applicable metaphors, but, of course, I am going to apply it to fishing lakes. The most successful stillwater angler is one who develops all the “edges” he can. An edge over the weather, over the conditions, over other anglers, and over the fish. Good and appropriate fishing gear can provide a significant edge for a lake fisherman, because of the unique “musts” for meeting the challenges of the lake angling environment, compared to stream and river fishing.
Rod selection starts when you think about what you need to accomplish when casting to quality lake fish. I have used the term quality to distinguish these from naïve hatchery trout which often take little skill, strategy, and good equipment to catch. I am addressing fishing for bigger, “educated” fish that are wary and easily alarmed, like those conditioned by heavy fishing pressure on public lakes. An essential ingredient in the mix is the ability to make long, smooth casts when dictated by the circumstances. Additionally, thought must be given to the challenges and obstacles to making reasonably long --- 50’ to 70’ --- casts. For instance, the fact that a caster sitting low in the water in a float tube must be conscious of slapping the water behind him with the fly line on a backcast pleads the case for a longer rod. More length, let’s say 9 ½’ or 10’, elevates the line slightly, decreasing the chance that an adequate caster will kill the cast as the line touches the water to his rear. Dealing with the wind is another consideration in rod and line weight selection. A fast-action rod that throws a tight line loop may be the best choice when casting into a stiff breeze. However, a fast-action rod can break a light leader when the hook set is too powerful. So, a compromise rod action may actually be a better choice. One more reason to think things through before you buy. When looking for the right lake fly rod for you, the number of choices may seem overwhelming. Be patient. Search and cast before you buy. Fly rods come in a variety of lengths and “line weight” designations. Let’s consider each with our end goal to find the ideal lake rod for you. Six to 16 feet is a range of rod lengths that you may encounter in a well-stocked fly shop. For lake fishermen, the most popular lengths are 9’ – 10’. This range provides the typical lake fly angler --- man or woman --- the optimum combination of casting ease, casting distance, comfort/minimum fatigue, and line control. It is the suggested fly line “weight” inscribed on the fly rod blank that indicates the appropriate quarry for a particular rod. When the rod is matched with its recommended fly line, the rod’s performance can be maximized, and the fly most easily presented to a fish at a reasonable distance. Fly line “weights” range from 0-weight through 14-weight. These whole numbers correspond to an actual physical weight of the tapered portion of a fly line, the first 30 to 40 feet. The unit of weight measure is a grain. 1 ounce = about 454 grains. Following is a general summary of line weights / fly rods matched to the typical target species: 0 – 3-weight fly lines/fly rods: panfish and small to average trout. 4 – 6-weight: typical trout rods 7 – 9-weight: typical steelhead, salmon, bass, and light saltwater. 10 – 14 -weight: big species saltwater or mountain rescue Now, let me remind you that the above classifications are accepted generalizations. I have landed 7-pound rainbows on a 3-weight fly rod, and I have captured 6” saltwater snappers on a 10-weight. However, it is usually best to select the appropriate rod for the particular species sought. There is no such thing as a “one-size-fits-all” fly rod. Let me demonstrate with a couple of sporting analogies. I usually golf once a year with my nephews as part of our annual 4th of July party weekend. I forgo the game the rest of the year because there is too little reward and too much frustration. However, the equipment used in the game serves as an excellent analogy for fly rod selection. As most people know, a variety of clubs is used to play a round of golf. A golf bag might have 10 different clubs to select from in a given situation. A good golfer will not use the same club to hit from the tee, lift a shot out of the woods, escape from a sand trap, and putt on the green. Similarly, a hunter would not use the same gun to hunt for doves or pheasants, as she would for deer and elk, or as she would to dispatch a rogue rhino charging the school children on the playground in an East African country. Yes, I could hit off the tee with my putter. Yes, I could draw down on a quail with a rhino rifle. Yes, I could catch a 6” trout with a flagpole. Get the appropriate tool for the job. The typical lake fly rod casts a 4-, 5-, or 6-weight fly line for pursuing trout and smaller warm water gamefish such as crappie and bluegill. For all-round general use, consider a 6-weight for longer casts and dealing with the wind. While a 6-weight can beat a ten-pound lake trout, you can still feel and enjoy the scrappy fight of an 8” fish. As for largemouth bass, a 7- or 8-weight rod may be a better choice. This has little to do with the size of the bass; it has to do with casting large, heavy, or air resistant flies, and being able to extract a fish that has burrowed into the underwater vegetation. Many bass anglers will immediately apply tremendous fighting pressure on a hooked bass to prevent it from entangling itself in the cover-rich environment quality bass prefer. A heavier rod is required to do this successfully. I own many rods, including lightweight models I dedicate to lake fishing that cast a 2- through 6-weight fly line. I have the luxury of matching a specific rod to a specific situation. If the wind is down, short casts will suffice, and the fish are not bigger than pan size, a two-or 3-weight is a lot of fun. My 3-weight gets a lot of use when I am trolling flies for BIG fish on a light leader. The soft, light tip of the rod bends like a rubber band when a hard strike comes, a strike that would normally snap my spider web line on a 5- or 6-weight rod. Additionally, when a strong, fast fish sprints away from me at high speed, my light rod tips absorb the sudden shock, keeping my light leader intact.
A Big Fish Story I was fishing with my friend Matt on a warm June day at Crane Prairie Reservoir in Central Oregon’s Cascade Mountains. In this man-made lake it is possible to find rainbows (Cranebows) is a common colloquialism) that will easily exceed ten pounds. That blue-sky afternoon the rainbows preferred a trolled damselfly nymph on transparent slow sinking line. We patrolled a particular stretch of water not too far from Osprey Point. The strikes were hard, sometimes vicious. If there was a heavy-handed response on the hook set, it was time to tie on a fresh fly. Because I was fishing a lightweight leader, I used my 3-weight rod with a soft tip to protect the line from a break off. When the hard strike came, the tip absorbed the impact. Though we never landed a ten-pound trout, we brought to hand an abundance of fish in the four to six pound range. How hard were the strikes? For whatever reason, I momentarily lost my focus as I looked other fishing activity on the lake. When a tremendous pull on my line came, my rod was pulled from my hand and started to “swim” away from me. Simultaneously, it began to sink slowly. Instinctively, I pivoted my float tube 180 degrees with a few quick kicks of my fins, and went in desperate pursuit. In a couple more kicks, I was near the sinking rod. I thrust my left arm straight down as far as I could reach. With any less effort, my fingertips would not have reached the descending rod. In retrospect, I was fortunate not to have capsized my tube with such a forceful lean. As I gathered my prodigal rod and my wits, I soon realized the culprit trout was still attached. Holding my rod securely (!), I eventually landed another spectacular Cranebow.
I am often asked if a light rod is at risk of being broken by a big fish. Maybe, but participating as a guide or angler in the capture of hundreds of large and extra large lake fish, I have never witnessed the breaking of a rod while fighting these fish. Modern graphite rods can easily withstand tremendous bend. But, if you perceive jeopardy when a strong fish puts a dangerous bend in your rod, merely drop the rod tip to a lower position toward the fish. You can minimize the bend to any degree you want, even to the extent where you position the rod horizontally, pointing it directly at the bruiser. However, with no shock-absorbing bend in the rod, there is an excellent chance you will break off a worthy fish.
Rod action --- the extent to which a rod bends over its entire length with a big fish on the line --- is usually chosen to suit the angler’s casting comfort. A fast-action fly rod is one where, generally, the upper quarter to one third of it readily bends. A medium action rod bends to its midpoint, while a slow, or full-flex, rod bends all the way to the grip. Each has its pros and cons. Each has its advocates and detractors. Most inexperienced fly fishers think that a fast-action fly rod is the best choice. I am sure they think of such a tool as a high-speed sports car. Because the rod tip is powerful and recovers quickly to its unbent “resting” position quickly, the fast action rod is capable of propelling a fly line at higher velocities, resulting in greater casting distance. However, just like driving a sports car at high speeds through the curves, timing and control can become overwhelming issues. Some casters can master the timing stroke and cast a long beautiful line. Others bully or mis-time the casting stroke rhythm of a fast rod, losing the distance potential. The fast rod will seem unmanageable and unpleasant. There are occasions --- low, clear water, for instance --- where a light tippet is required to fool large lake fish. With a fast-action rod there can be a high impact force imparted to the leader that can easily break off the fly. There may be too little ”give” in the rod tip if the hook set is too forceful, little, if any, shock absorption. An overly powerful response to a big strike will part the leader. An escaped fish with a fly still in its jaws may jump, responding to the sting still in its mouth. That way, at least, you may see the fish you might have landed. In contrast to the tip-action rod, there is the slow or full-flex action. The bending and recovery of the tip takes longer than the other actions, and the casting stroke is much slower. An impatient caster may move the rod back and forth too quickly, not allowing the bending rod to reach the natural terminus of its flex in either direction. Calmed relaxation is a good mental posture with this action type. This is not the rod action for the hyperactive. The longer, extended flextime of the slow action rod allows a focused caster to better feel the bend of the rod. Also, the slow action accentuates the feel of the unfurling fly line, as it straightens out on the back cast. This signals just the right moment to move the rod tip in the opposite direction in the cast. An attentive angler has time to process and prepare for the next stroke to begin. This, I call a “forgiving” action. The slower flex allows better for imperfect timing --- within reasonable limits --- of the casting stroke. And, for those who may have fished quality bamboo or fiberglass fly rods in their careers, the slow action feels quite normal. The possibility of breaking off a fish on the strike is reduced with a full-flex rod. Acting like a springy shock absorber, the impact of a solid hook set against resistance is cushioned. While fighting a big fish, a heavy-handed angler who tries to turn a stubborn fish will have a lesser chance of a break off than an angler performing the same maneuver with a stiff, fast-action stick. It is the same effect as playing a good trout on a lighter, more limber 3- or 4-weight fly rod. The majority of fly rods will fall into the broad medium-action category, flexing most commonly down to its mid section. Take a fast-action and a slow-action model, and then split the difference. It is here that most fly anglers will settle with their choice when it comes to selecting a fly rod. I highly recommend that you cast any rod you consider buying. Even an expensive rod can feel “clunky”, or heavy, or uncomfortable, or too heavy in the tip. The grip might look pretty on the display, but be too big or too small for your hand. Even if your casting skill is minimal, cast before you buy. You would not, I think, buy a mail-order bride without a photo, nor buy a car sight unseen. Always take a rod for a test drive in the alley or on the lawn before plunking down your cash. Its appearance on the rack may have little bearing on the rod’s feel and performance.
Examine the components on the rod: the cork grip, reel seat, the guides, the thread wraps on the guides, and the epoxy or urethane finish work on the wraps. The majority of the guides --- usually twisted ‘s’ snake guides --- need to be made of chrome-plated stainless steel or some Space Age alloy. Do not settle for mere stainless steel guides. They will wear with time, and more easily corroded if ever used in saltwater. They may have to be replaced in a few years. Not an inexpensive proposition. If you do not know their composition, ask the guy or gal behind the counter. Read the manufacturer’s literature. Also, count the number of guides tied on the rod, not including the tiptop. On a quality fly rod there should be at least one more guide than the whole number of feet in the fly rod’s length. Example: a 9’ or 9 ½’ rod should have at least 10 guides. As the rod is flexed forward and backward during a normal cast, the line in the guides should mirror the flex. If the guides are too far apart because the manufacturer or rod builder cut corners on work time and materials to save money, the line will slap the rod blank during the cast, creating friction that slows the line as it slides through the rod guides. Casting distance is decreased. Additionally, when the rod you hold horizontal on the forward stroke as the cast is completed, the line sags between consecutive guides, again causing distance-killing friction. More guides than I have recommended are not necessarily better. One rod manufacturer attaches two more guides than the whole number of feet in the rod length. No problem, but any more are certainly not needed, and will only add excess weight and stiffness to the rod. Just like an inexperienced driver can get a feel for the vehicle that suits him and his budget, an inexperienced fly caster will feel an affinity for a rod that appeals. It will seem comfortable and pleasant to cast, even though the casting stroke is far from perfection. So to make a wise choice, put your pride aside and do some comparison casting. You will not know what suits you unless you compare. No matter your experience level, do this. It may preclude you saving a few bucks by buying that “deal” on the internet or in the bargain bin, but look long term. The right rod may be fished for a lifetime. If you amortize a few extra dollars over a lifetime, it can mean only a few pennies a year. How much money did you waste on that pair of shoes that never fit right, or that CD you listened to once in six years? Compare, and don’t skimp on the cost. That way you will only have to buy right rod once.
Fly Lines --- Endless PossibilitiesHere are some of the possible choices/variables you will deal with from when selecting the fly line, or lines, for your lake fishing needs: taper, color, length, full floating, full sinking, floating/sinking combination, length of sinking portion, sink rate, quality level / price, and manufacturer. Combining all these variables will present the angler with more than 200 choices. Yikes! Unless you have a good reason backed by personal knowledgeable or experienced advice, I am suggesting that you consider using the lines I personally have found useful and effective. For most lake anglers getting started, I recommend two fly lines: the first is a high quality, high-visibility, weight-forward tapered, floating fly line. A high quality line lasts longer, casts better, floats higher and longer than a cheap fly line. As for a hi-vis color, you want to be able to see --- approximately --- where your fly is drifting as you fish it. I’m ahead of you here. Yes, fish can see color. However, it is not the fly line color that startles a fish, but the shadow and splash as the line lands. The second must-have fly line for stillwaters is a clear or “camo” slow sinking (intermediate or Type I) model. Sink rates are usually designated with a Roman numeral from I to VI, Type I or “intermediate density” being the slowest, sinking at a rate of between ¾” to 1 ½” per second, and Type VI the fastest, dropping at 8’ – 10” per second. If you add a third line to your arsenal, make it a Type III density-compensated one, in a dark color. To cast effortlessly, and have the fly line and leader fully extend on the cast, a fly line must have a standard fly line must be tapered. In my opinion, a double taper fly line --- which most beginners have heard of --- is a specialty fly line with a couple of serious limitations for the majority of average fly rodders, including casting long distances and overcoming the wind. A weight forward taper when properly cast --- maximizes distance, performs better than a double taper in the wind, and does a better job of presenting heavy and air-resistant large flies at distance. Use a floating fly line to present dry flies, shallow-running wet flies, and nymphs in shallow water. The floating line is also used when suspending nymphs and midge larvae and pupae in water of any depth. The floater is also the easiest line to cast, mend, visually track, and pick off the water to re-cast. When circumstances require a sinking fly line, I most often use my clear (“transparent”) slow-sinking line in shallow water, usually not more than 10’ deep. I use this line in shallow water where I might normally prefer my floating line, but because the wind is blowing my slow sinking, clear line descends below the surface currents. When the wind blows a big curve into my floating line, I miss or may not even detect subtle strikes; I do not have a straight-line contact with my fly. Because the clear intermediate line sinks below the surface, I have the straight-line contact I need. If the water where the fish are cruising and feeding is shallow, it is the slow sinking line that keeps my flies from dropping immediately to the bottom where they would, then, be caught in the vegetation or pick up debris on the hook point. The Type III full sinking line is most useful for me where the water exceeds ten feet. |
Contact Information
Telephone
Postal address
EMail
Copyright © 2003 Scarlet Ibis Fly Fishing Tours Inc
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ |